wolf
Junior Member
Posts: 26
|
Post by wolf on May 7, 2009 13:37:28 GMT -6
Has anyone heard of any results of the Court Hearings today for the helmet tickets??
|
|
|
Post by freebird on May 7, 2009 15:49:18 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by DG1 Phillip on May 7, 2009 16:46:02 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by bigbuck on May 7, 2009 17:11:13 GMT -6
He wus on a MOPED probably got paid to get the ticket and plead guilty Anybody got the plates on that moped to see who it wus rented to? Mayor or one of council members could have staged the whole thing just to get an I am guilty and will pay wy fine on the first one that went to trial. Why weren't the rest of the lid tickets on the agenda for the same day if they were issued on the same day
|
|
|
Post by freebird on May 7, 2009 17:50:33 GMT -6
None of those represented by Tom McGrath have even been served. And they likely wont be because the City has no vehicle to do that just as we said. Suks to be ridin a lawnmower or moped tho. Shoulda called Tom or Thad.. ;D
|
|
|
Post by bigbuck on May 7, 2009 17:58:43 GMT -6
None of those represented by Tom McGrath have even been served. And they likely wont be because the City has no vehicle to do that just as we said. Suks to be ridin a lawnmower or moped tho. Shoulda called Tom or Thad.. ;D Oh So true
|
|
|
Post by seaside on May 7, 2009 20:43:30 GMT -6
He wus on a MOPED probably got paid to get the ticket and plead guilty Anybody got the plates on that moped to see who it wus rented to? Mayor or one of council members could have staged the whole thing just to get an I am guilty and will pay wy fine on the first one that went to trial. Why weren't the rest of the lid tickets on the agenda for the same day if they were issued on the same day I don't have the plates but here's some other info: Date of Offense: 04/04/2009 Court Date :05/07/2009 Criminal/Traffic CourtDefendant: Pough, Leon Case Type: Criminal Court Agency: Myrtle Beach Municipal Court Case Number: 20150 Charge Code - Charge Description -2620614224 - Ordinance / Helmet and Protective eye-wear Required This ain't his first rodeo.... Date of ticket: 04/05/2009 Court Date: 05/07/2009 Criminal/Traffic Court Case Number: 37584EW Charge: 2061 - Traffic / Moped licensing provisions violation - 1st offense Date of ticket: 04/21/2009 Court Date: 05/07/2009 2515 - Traffic / Disregarding stop sign Date of ticket: 04/21/2009 Court Date: 05/07/2009 Charge: 0701 - Traffic / Driving without a license - 1st offense Do you want the plate info or do you want his address? Maybe someone could drive by and give him some advice for next time
|
|
|
Post by freebird on May 7, 2009 21:11:35 GMT -6
Seaside I think we should wait till he learns to ride with the big dogs....Running a stop sign with no helmet and no liscense. Can't fix stupid
|
|
|
Post by geezer on May 8, 2009 3:41:09 GMT -6
I guess the "Three Strike Rule" doesn't apply to mopeds. ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by bigbuck on May 8, 2009 3:54:40 GMT -6
still find it interesting that his violation was on 4-4-09 and the violations written on 2-28-09 still haven't had their court date Could the city be avoiding confrontation from those who know the law is bogus and just scheduling those for court who do not know any better than to pay the fine? Maybe they are stalling until after the rally to avoid their helmet law being beaten in court.
|
|
|
Post by classic53 on May 8, 2009 5:15:17 GMT -6
exact a mundo there bigbuck. They know when they will win and when they will loose. I can't see a moped rider taking it to a higher court. Especially a q-tipper!
|
|
|
Post by geezer on May 8, 2009 5:20:14 GMT -6
The original tickets should have had the date and where to report for court on them. Since all that has changed, it would seem to me that those tickets are void now. I can't remember the date, but is 04-04-2009 after the change in courts?
|
|
|
Post by freebird on May 8, 2009 7:50:31 GMT -6
The original tickets should have had the date and where to report for court on them. Since all that has changed, it would seem to me that those tickets are void now. I can't remember the date, but is 04-04-2009 after the change in courts? Geeze The City wrote Tom to serve his clients but he told them that he represents them only and for the City to serve them as that is Their Job. Problem is they have no way to serve them as 56-7-80 B clearly states. We will probably need another ride so we can get it into court. Thad Viers brother has not been served either if my info is correct. SECTION 56-7-80. County or municipal uniform ordinance summons. (B) The uniform ordinance summons may not be used to perform a custodial arrest. No county or municipal ordinance which regulates the use of motor vehicles on the public roads of this State may be enforced using an ordinance summons
|
|
|
Post by beachbikers1 on May 8, 2009 20:15:39 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by freebird on May 8, 2009 21:33:50 GMT -6
Hummmm... Lets see.... Well... Thats how I see it. And since the City still hasn't done squat I guess they must have read ibiker and figured it out.
|
|